Skilled nursing facilities · California

Del Amo Gardens Care Center

Torrance, CA · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Del Amo Gardens Care Center runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Del Amo Gardens Care Center: 7.7 TCR = 119% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Del Amo Gardens Care Center safety composite

Del Amo Gardens Care Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Del Amo Gardens Care Center: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 27.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2024

Del Amo Gardens Care Center's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Torrance, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.7 · 119% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #348/739
  • PHOTO LP Johnson City, LLC…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Johnson City, LLC --Princeton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Del Amo Gardens Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Del Amo Gardens Care Center averages 7.7 TCR (119% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Del Amo Gardens Care Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=27.3 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=11.9 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Del Amo Gardens Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #348 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Del Amo Gardens Care Center (77 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Del Amo Gardens Care Center
Del Amo Gardens Care Center (77 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Del Amo Gardens Care Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.3 7.3 4 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 3 0 0
2020 11.9 10.2 4 3 0
2019 5.7 5.7 4 0 0
2018 27.3 13.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Torrance

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Torrance, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Johnson City, LLC --Princeton 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellington Parc Health Systems 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harmony Physical Rehabilitation 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROSEBUD VILLAGE 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Innovative Produce, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bokisch Vineyard Management 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bassman 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE COR Chico Business Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 4,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Torrance Memorial Medical Center 3,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 494 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Festival Foods Brooklyn Park 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St Anthony Hospital 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2458 - Aurora South 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1088 - Reston 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edgecombe Furniture 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE CECO Concrete Construction : Minneapolis 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stokes Marine, Inc 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE MAC LTT Stainless Division, Inc. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.