Light rail cars and equipment manufacturing · North Carolina

Dellner Inc. US

Charlotte, NC · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dellner Inc. US runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Light rail cars and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Dellner Inc. US: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Light rail cars and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dellner Inc. US safety composite

Dellner Inc. US scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

Dellner Inc. US injury rate improved

Dellner Inc. US's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=13.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336510 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Oak Creek
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oak Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dellner Inc. US in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dellner Inc. US averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Light rail cars and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dellner Inc. US TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=13 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dellner Inc. US falls in its industry

208 Light rail cars and equipment establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Light rail cars and equipment employers in North Carolina.

Dellner Inc. US (35 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dellner Inc. US
Dellner Inc. US (35 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Dellner Inc. US has fewer employees than the Light rail cars and equipment manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 13.0 3.3 4 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336510 · NC · Charlotte

208 Light rail cars and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oak Creek 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRRC MA Corporation Springfield 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amsted Rail Greenville 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Decoursey KY Car Shop 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boykin Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW COLONY SOW FARM 6276 -EST 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Field Services 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Arrow Linen Supply Company, Inc. Brooklyn Location 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IEA - Brooklyn Park 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UMElPresidente959 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack Bros., Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big D Floor Covering Supplies 1 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kershaw Facility 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poly Processing Company, LLC French Camp 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE S A White Oil Co Inc 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.