Teeth, custom made in dental laboratories · Massachusetts

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America

Waltham, MA · ~172 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Teeth, custom made in dental laboratories workplace, earning a grade A.

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Teeth, custom made in dental laboratories BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America safety composite

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2018→2024

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America injury rate improved

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339116 · Waltham, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P97
  • PHOTO ROE Dental Laborator…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ROE Dental Laboratory, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dentsply Sirona Implants North America averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Teeth, custom made in dental laboratories BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dentsply Sirona Implants North America falls in its industry

184 Teeth, custom made in dental l establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Dentsply Sirona Implants North America (172 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Dentsply Sirona Implants North America
Dentsply Sirona Implants North America (172 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Dentsply Sirona Implants North America has more employees than the Teeth, custom made in dental laboratorie median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2018 1.7 0.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339116 · MA · Waltham

184 Teeth, custom made in dental laboratories employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 118 employers in Waltham, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ROE Dental Laboratory, INC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NDX Rogers 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bruce Henry Properties Florida LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NDX ROGERS DENTAL LABRATORIES 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Daniel OConnells Sons Inc 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ryan Company, Inc 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE uniQure, Inc 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE NeedleTech Products, Inc 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR RESERVOIR WOODS (MA42) 2,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR 170 Data Drive Work Location-MAAV 1,985 FTE
CITY-NEAR RESERVOIR WOODS-MA42 1,736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Partners Home Care Inc 786 FTE
NAT-TCR Piedmont Clinic 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Supreme Services & Specialty Company Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chemtrade Refinery Solutions LP Toledo Acid 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Executive Division 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Del Monte Foods, Inc 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preload LLC 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ortec - Easley 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darrington Division 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.