Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing · Tennessee

DeRoyal Processing Center

New Tazewell, TN · ~61 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeRoyal Processing Center runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

DeRoyal Processing Center: 4.4 TCR = 132% of Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeRoyal Processing Center safety composite

DeRoyal Processing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

DeRoyal Processing Center injury rate improved

DeRoyal Processing Center's TCR fell 1.3 from 8.1 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · New Tazewell, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 132% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #18/21
  • PHOTO ECD
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ECD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

DeRoyal Processing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeRoyal Processing Center averages 4.4 TCR (132% of the Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeRoyal Processing Center TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where DeRoyal Processing Center falls in its industry

555 Supports, orthopedic (e.g., ab establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 21 Supports, orthopedic (e.g., ab employers in Tennessee.

DeRoyal Processing Center (61 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DeRoyal Processing Center
DeRoyal Processing Center (61 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

DeRoyal Processing Center has fewer employees than the Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 4.6 3 0 0
2023 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 3 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 7.8 7.8 5 0 0
2016 8.1 6.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · TN · New Tazewell

555 Supports, orthopedic (e.g., abdominal, ankle, arch, kneecap), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 20 employers in New Tazewell, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ECD 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pride Mobility Products Old Forge 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA- Medical Depot, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HR Pharmaceuticals 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CORPORATE OFFICE 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Utility Construction, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOB 230B 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blount County Highway Dept 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR England Furniture 1,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR England, Inc. 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clayton Giles 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janco Inc. 155 FTE
NAT-TCR Oconee Egg Farm 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Massey Services 12 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Utility Department 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vancouver - BMD 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raymond Management Company Madison Office 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 012-MAN 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms McComb Feed Mill 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.