Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Michigan

DeWitt Packaging Corporation

Grand Rapids, MI · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DeWitt Packaging Corporation runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

DeWitt Packaging Corporation: 4.9 TCR = 148% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DeWitt Packaging Corporation safety composite

DeWitt Packaging Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2023

DeWitt Packaging Corporation injury rate improved

DeWitt Packaging Corporation's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.6 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/60
  • PHOTO CA100 Madera Contai…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA100 Madera Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

DeWitt Packaging Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DeWitt Packaging Corporation averages 4.9 TCR (148% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DeWitt Packaging Corporation TCR series: 2018=2.6 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where DeWitt Packaging Corporation falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 60 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Michigan.

DeWitt Packaging Corporation (46 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate DeWitt Packaging Corporation
DeWitt Packaging Corporation (46 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

DeWitt Packaging Corporation has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 9.4 4.7 4 0 0
2020 5.3 2.7 2 0 0
2019 9.8 9.8 4 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MI · Grand Rapids

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA100 Madera Container 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Sheets 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innerpak of Wisconsin, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR McLean Packaging Corp. 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Solution Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBA FALKNER FARMS 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROB MAINTENANCE 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE EDL Energy 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Scott Dugas Trucking & Excavating, Inc 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1300-Autograph Otis/Ac Austin Dt/Ut 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 55445 Burnsville 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 9900 on Memorial Apartments 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The A Johnson Co., LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mies & Sons - Colwich 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE SF - Santa Fe 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bend BN 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.