Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Midwest Hardwood Corp.

Maple Grove, MN · ~83 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Hardwood Corp. runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Midwest Hardwood Corp.: 2.3 TCR = 106% of Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Hardwood Corp. safety composite

Midwest Hardwood Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2020

Midwest Hardwood Corp. injury rate improved

Midwest Hardwood Corp.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 2.2 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Maple Grove, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #6/28
  • PHOTO UF INTERNATIONAL
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UF INTERNATIONAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Hardwood Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Hardwood Corp. averages 2.3 TCR (106% of the Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Hardwood Corp. TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 2.2

Where Midwest Hardwood Corp. falls in its industry

1,225 Building board (e.g., fiber, f establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 28 Building board (e.g., fiber, f employers in Minnesota.

Midwest Hardwood Corp. (83 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Hardwood Corp.
Midwest Hardwood Corp. (83 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Midwest Hardwood Corp. has more employees than the Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, part median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 3.7 1.2 3 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 2.2 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · MN · Maple Grove

1,225 Building board (e.g., fiber, flake, particle) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UF INTERNATIONAL 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snavely Forest Products Denver 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FG ROSWELL 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jones Lumber - Boca Raton 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE King Gen Plant-PD 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE MVEC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tec Construction of Brainerd, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&D Construction, Inc. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville), LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : LIH - Lihue 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Klauer Manufacturing Co. - Washington Plant 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #6508 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PDC Services, Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Design Fabrication and Installation, Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyer's Food Markets Inc - Tamaqua 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : FAR - Fargo 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.