In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Minnesota

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska

Chaska, MN · ~917 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska: 1.0 TCR = 32% of In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska safety composite

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska held a steady TCR band

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Chaska, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO ARDx Westbrook
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~917 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARDx Westbrook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska averages 1.0 TCR (32% of the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska falls in its industry

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 In-vitro diagnostic substances employers in Minnesota.

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska (917 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska
Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska (917 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Chaska has more employees than the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.4 7 0 0
2023 1.3 0.7 12 0 0
2022 0.6 0.5 5 0 0
2021 0.6 0.2 5 0 0
2020 1.3 0.6 11 0 0
2019 1.3 1.0 12 0 0
2018 1.8 1.1 16 1 0
2017 0.7 0.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · MN · Chaska

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 87 employers in Chaska, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARDx Westbrook 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Promega Biosciences LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lonza Walkersville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3471 Campus (Corporate, MMF, Richards) 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE West St Paul ISD #197 917 FTE
STATE-SIZE MP NEXLEVEL, LLC 915 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP9 915 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Rivers Park District 915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Medical 830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entegris - Chaska 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entegris Chaska Bldg 3 446 FTE
NAT-TCR Central CA 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kem Farms, Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Office and Warehouse Division 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Danville-Pittsylvania Community Services 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shelbyville IL 917 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Alameda 917 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marsing Agricultural Labor Sponsorship Committee 917 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong World Industries, Inc. - Corporate Campus 918 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.