Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground · Indiana

Directline Communications Inc.

Mishawaka, IN · ~80 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Directline Communications Inc. runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground workplace, earning a grade C.

Directline Communications Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 115% of Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Directline Communications Inc. safety composite

Directline Communications Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Directline Communications Inc.: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Directline Communications Inc.'s TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Mishawaka, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 115% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #25/30
  • PHOTO Electric Power Board…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electric Power Board of Chattanooga (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Directline Communications Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Directline Communications Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (115% of the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Directline Communications Inc. TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Directline Communications Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 30 Cable laying (e.g., cable tele employers in Indiana.

Directline Communications Inc. (80 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Directline Communications Inc.
Directline Communications Inc. (80 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Directline Communications Inc. has more employees than the Cable laying (e.g., cable television, el median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2023 6.1 3.6 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · IN · Mishawaka

1,605 Cable laying (e.g., cable television, electricity, marine, telephone), including underground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 185 employers in Mishawaka, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electric Power Board of Chattanooga 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bristol Tennessee Essential Services 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Power Inc-NM-Albuquerque 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 180-NiSource-Crown Point IN-Operating HQ 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE XL Industrial Services, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elbrecht Investments 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete 40 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center Mishawaka 1,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR AM General, LLC 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCI - 039 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2678 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Reddog Industries 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Show Motion, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3320 - DC New York Ave NE 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryder location 4003 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hudson County Correctional Center 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermal Circuits, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Birmingham 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE PENN Greenhouse LLC 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.