Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Indiana

Indiana Galvanizing

Middlebury, IN · ~80 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Indiana Galvanizing runs at 486% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Indiana Galvanizing: 16.0 TCR = 486% of Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Indiana Galvanizing safety composite

Indiana Galvanizing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.7

2018→2024

Indiana Galvanizing injury rate improved

Indiana Galvanizing's TCR fell 14.7 from 17.1 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 46.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=17.1 · 2019=46.8 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=17.2 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Middlebury, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 486% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #31/32
  • PHOTO APX Industrial Coati…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: APX Industrial Coatings (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Indiana Galvanizing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Indiana Galvanizing averages 16.0 TCR (486% of the Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Indiana Galvanizing TCR series: 2018=17.1 · 2019=46.8 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=17.2 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Indiana Galvanizing falls in its industry

646 Galvanizing metals and metal p establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 32 Galvanizing metals and metal p employers in Indiana.

Indiana Galvanizing (80 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Indiana Galvanizing
Indiana Galvanizing (80 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Indiana Galvanizing has more employees than the Galvanizing metals and metal products fo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2023 6.6 5.3 5 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 5 0 0
2021 17.2 8.6 8 0 0
2020 15.7 13.1 12 0 0
2019 46.8 17.8 21 0 0
2018 17.1 3.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · IN · Middlebury

646 Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 47 employers in Middlebury, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR APX Industrial Coatings 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Finishing - B&C 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Powder Coating Corp 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Bend Galvanizing 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 180-NiSource-Crown Point IN-Operating HQ 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE XL Industrial Services, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Directline Communications Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elbrecht Investments 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jayco Inc 2,751 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Design Rv 2,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCI - 028 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lozier Corporation - Middlebury 401 FTE
NAT-TCR FKG Logistics LLC 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Burnham LLC d/b/a Burnham Commercial Steel Plant 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fairfax Fire Department 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shawnee Colonial Estates 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA OR Woodburn Plant 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE JW Warehouse logistics LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE CertainTeed Shreveport 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Manufacturing 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.