Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

Discovery Villages at Melbourne

Melbourne, FL · ~100 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
32.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Discovery Villages at Melbourne runs at 848% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Discovery Villages at Melbourne: 32.2 TCR = 848% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Discovery Villages at Melbourne safety composite

Discovery Villages at Melbourne scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 32.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 43.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Discovery Villages at Melbourne: 20.7 → 43.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 43.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2021

Discovery Villages at Melbourne's TCR rose 23.1 from 20.7 in 2020 to 43.8 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 32.2 · 848% of ind

  • DART 43.8 DART
  • RANK #283/283
  • PHOTO Primrose Retirement …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City (2.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Discovery Villages at Melbourne in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Discovery Villages at Melbourne averages 32.2 TCR (848% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Discovery Villages at Melbourne TCR series: 2020=20.7 · 2021=43.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Discovery Villages at Melbourne falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #283 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Discovery Villages at Melbourne (100 employees, TCR 32.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Discovery Villages at Melbourne
Discovery Villages at Melbourne (100 employees, TCR 32.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Discovery Villages at Melbourne has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 43.8 43.8 11 24 0
2020 20.7 18.2 15 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Melbourne

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Edgewater 29.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Terrace 29.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Castle Peak Senior Care 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nobility Homes, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. R. GAMESON LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Osprey Village 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aspire Ridge Haven 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-306) 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-279) 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7441-Enphg-Allegheny College 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Spencer Turbine Company 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.