Adult and Child residential corporate foster care · Minnesota

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead

Moorhead, MN · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Adult and Child residential corporate foster care workplace, earning a grade C.

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead: 3.8 TCR = 101% of Adult and Child residential corporate foster care BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead safety composite

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2018→2023

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead injury rate improved

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead's TCR fell 6.5 from 6.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.5 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Moorhead, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/44
  • PHOTO Visiting Angels Beth…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Visiting Angels Bethlehem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Divine House Inc. - Moorhead averages 3.8 TCR (101% of the Adult and Child residential corporate foster care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead TCR series: 2018=6.5 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Divine House Inc. - Moorhead falls in its industry

1,320 Adult and Child residential co establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 44 Adult and Child residential co employers in Minnesota.

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead (43 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Divine House Inc. - Moorhead
Divine House Inc. - Moorhead (43 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Divine House Inc. - Moorhead has fewer employees than the Adult and Child residential corporate fo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2020 6.5 3.3 2 0 0
2019 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2018 6.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Moorhead

1,320 Adult and Child residential corporate foster care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Moorhead, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Visiting Angels Bethlehem 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poteau Plus 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sacramento 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark-SB 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University Moorhead 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Moorhead 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eventide on Eighth 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Crystal Sugar Company Moorhead 387 FTE
NAT-TCR E.G.O. North America, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Torrington Station 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Suddath Relocation Systems of Atlanta, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CONSTRUCTION 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bryant Racing Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koester Construction Company Incorporated 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Antigo Neon, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maclan Corporation 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.