Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · California

Division 11

Long Beach, CA · ~198 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Division 11 runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Division 11: 9.4 TCR = 210% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Division 11 safety composite

Division 11 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2017→2024

Division 11 injury rate improved

Division 11's TCR fell 5.2 from 10.9 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.9 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=12.8 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Long Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 210% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #48/75
  • PHOTO TriMet Merlo Operati…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~198 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TriMet Merlo Operations Facility (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Division 11 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Division 11 averages 9.4 TCR (210% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Division 11 TCR series: 2017=10.9 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=12.8 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Division 11 falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 75 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in California.

Division 11 (198 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Division 11
Division 11 (198 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Division 11 has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 3.2 7 7 0
2023 12.8 8.8 17 9 0
2022 9.8 7.0 13 8 0
2021 11.5 8.4 12 10 0
2020 10.4 7.0 13 5 0
2019 5.1 2.2 11 3 0
2017 10.9 9.5 10 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · CA · Long Beach

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TriMet Merlo Operations Facility 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55433 Independence 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TriMet Powell Operations 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1131 74TH WOOD SCHEDULED TRANSIT OPERATIONS 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WMJ Farms, Incorporated 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berries 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Al Pak Labor, Inc. El Centro 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103430 - Oroville Dam Interim Spillway Repair 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Jonesboro Coca-Cola 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Waynesboro 008 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BB - Prospect 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Professional Properties dba Vista Mesa Assisted Living Residence 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cupertino Electric, Inc. - Ohio Operations 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bamberg County 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pleasanton 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE James L Maher Center 198 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.