Mixed Mode Transit System · California

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System

San Diego, CA · ~198 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System runs at 351% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed Mode Transit System workplace, earning a grade F.

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System: 15.8 TCR = 351% of Mixed Mode Transit System BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System safety composite

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System: 15.7 → 19.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 20.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System's TCR rose 3.6 from 15.7 in 2017 to 19.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 351% of ind

  • DART 8.7 DART
  • RANK #70/75
  • PHOTO 1953-4125
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 189 inj
  • SIZE ~198 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1953-4125 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows San Diego Metropolitan Transit System averages 15.8 TCR (351% of the Mixed Mode Transit System BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System TCR series: 2017=15.7 · 2018=20.4 · 2019=16.7 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=13 · 2022=18.3 · 2023=17.3 · 2024=19.3 · BLS 4.5

Where San Diego Metropolitan Transit System falls in its industry

421 Mixed Mode Transit System establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 75 Mixed Mode Transit System employers in California.

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (198 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate San Diego Metropolitan Transit System
San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (198 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System has fewer employees than the Mixed Mode Transit System median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.3 8.7 31 0 0
2023 17.3 7.3 26 0 0
2022 18.3 9.9 26 0 0
2021 13.0 5.5 19 0 0
2020 5.7 2.5 9 0 0
2019 16.7 8.7 25 0 0
2018 20.4 7.5 30 0 0
2017 15.7 4.8 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · CA · San Diego

421 Mixed Mode Transit System employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1953-4125 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 9 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority - North Division 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-4056 16.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE WMJ Farms, Incorporated 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berries 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Al Pak Labor, Inc. El Centro 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103430 - Oroville Dam Interim Spillway Repair 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0622 Washington 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Martinsburg Ground 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Custom Ext. 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack Hilliard Distributing Co., Inc Katy 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cupertino Electric, Inc. - Ohio Operations 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bamberg County 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE James L Maher Center 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pleasanton 198 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.