Water control and quality program administration · California

Division of Environmental Services

West Sacramento, CA · ~185 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Division of Environmental Services runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Division of Environmental Services: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Division of Environmental Services safety composite

Division of Environmental Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Division of Environmental Services held a steady TCR band

Division of Environmental Services's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · West Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #14/56
  • PHOTO Puget Sound Clean Ai…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~185 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Division of Environmental Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Division of Environmental Services averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Division of Environmental Services TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Division of Environmental Services falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 56 Water control and quality prog employers in California.

Division of Environmental Services (185 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Division of Environmental Services
Division of Environmental Services (185 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Division of Environmental Services has more employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · West Sacramento

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 188 employers in West Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Puget Sound Clean Air Agency 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR O&M Headquarters 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Integrated Science and Engineering 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ERO 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Chiala Farms, Inc. 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE JSJ Harvesting, LLC 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glad-A-Way Gardens, Inc. 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE VLC FARM LABOR, INC 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR HEADQUARTERS: COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS 6,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration 4,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of General Services 3,631 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 36 2,161 FTE
NAT-TCR Princeton R&D 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Morcofab 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pesado Construction Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Genesis 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meijer 235 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claiborne Hauling, LLC 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of South St. Paul MN 185 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean View Nursing Home 185 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.