Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Georgia

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc.

Douglas, GA · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade A.

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 28% of Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. safety composite

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2020

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. injury rate improved

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Douglas, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/37
  • PHOTO Superior Industrial …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Superior Industrial Maintenance Company, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (28% of the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fencing contractors (except el establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 37 Fencing contractors (except el employers in Georgia.

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc.
Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Dixie Fence & Kennel, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fencing contractors (except electronic c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · GA · Douglas

1,634 Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 67 employers in Douglas, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Superior Industrial Maintenance Company, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Crane Service, LLC - Salt Lake City, UT 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Industries LLC - IPL Power Plant - Petersburg 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collins & Hermann 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRH Healthcare INC 1,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6010 988 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6010 965 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing plant 906 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Valley Marketplace #53 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR GP Rubber 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens Corning Thermafiber Joplin 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hamilton Contracting LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE BT Jackson 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martins Ferry TENORM Processing Facility 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exodus Exterminating 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardner Landscaping LLC 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.