Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) · Texas

DM Clincial Research Cyfair

Name: DM Clincial Research Cyfair Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Houston, TX · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 1.7
Avg TCR: 0.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DM Clincial Research Cyfair runs at 332% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade F.

DM Clincial Research Cyfair: 1.7 TCR = 332% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DM Clincial Research Cyfair safety composite

DM Clincial Research Cyfair scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DM Clincial Research Cyfair: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

DM Clincial Research Cyfair's TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2023 to 3.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541714 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.7 · 332% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK P24
PHOTO Spaulding Clinical R…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spaulding Clinical Research (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.7
Janssen Pharma

1.7
Spaulding Clin

1.6
Encodia, Inc.

1.6
Irving St Buil

1.6

What this shows DM Clincial Research Cyfair averages 1.7 TCR (332% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

DM Clincial Research Cyfair TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 0.5

Where DM Clincial Research Cyfair falls in its industry

21 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

DM Clincial Research Cyfair (53 employees, TCR 1.7) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 915 employees and a TCR of 1.5

DM Clincial Research Cyfair has fewer employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	3.3	0.0	1	1	0
2023	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541714 · TX · Houston

21 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Spaulding Clinical Research	WEST BEND, WI	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Janssen Pharmaceutical RandD San Diego	SAN DIEGO, CA	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Encodia, Inc.	SAN DIEGO, CA	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Irving St Building A R&D - Boise	BOISE, ID	1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	XIT Feeders	DALHART	53 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wolf Creek Feedyard	PERRYTON	53 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Western Cattle Feeders, LLC	LOCKNEY	53 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Glasscock County Coop	ST LAWRENCE	53 FTE
CITY-NEAR	IAH IAH	Houston	11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR	IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices	Houston	10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6925-IAH	Houston	9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center	Houston	8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR	Vancouver 10102	Vancouver, WA	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Columbus 10150	Columbus, OH	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hopwood	Hopwood, PA	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Stock Yards Greensburg	Greensburg, PA	1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Dedicated Duncan	Duncan, OK	53 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Aerobotix, Inc.	Madison, AL	53 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lincoln Park 10101	Lincoln Park, MI	53 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Portage 10187	Portage, MI	53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.