Industry profile · NAICS 541714

Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development)

Workplace injury rates across 41 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

41
Employers
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
408
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) average 1.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 3.9 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

1.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
41
employers reporting
408
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) Safety Data Reveals

The Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) sector (NAICS 541714) encompasses 41 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 408 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 1
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
NBR Pontaluna Norton Shores, MI F 13.3
PepGen Inc. Boston, MA F 4.8
DM Clinical Research Tomball 13406 Tomball, TX F 3.3
Mason Manufacturing Building Mason, OH F 2.2
Janssen Pharmaceutical RandD San Diego San Diego, CA F 1.7
DM Clincial Research Cyfair Houston, TX F 1.7
Spaulding Clinical Research West Bend, WI F 1.6
Encodia, Inc. San Diego, CA F 1.6
Irving St Building A R&D - Boise Boise, ID F 1.6
DM Clinical Research New Jersey Jersey City, NJ F 1.5
Pleasanton, CA Pleasanton, CA F 1.5
Oxford Nanoimaging Inc San Diego, CA F 1.2
Genentech SSF South San Francisco, CA F 1.1
Minnetonka, MN Minnetonka, MN D 0.8
Hq & Field Mason, OH D 0.7
LanzaTech Skokie, IL C 0.6
DM Clinical Research Corporate Houston, TX C 0.5
Ironwood-HQ Cambridge, MA C 0.5
Janssen RandD Spring House Spring House, PA B 0.3
Ginkgo Bioworks Inc. Drydock Ave. Boston, MA A 0.1
Milliken & Company- RMC (Corporate Headquarters) Spartanburg, SC A 0.1
Grifols Therapuetics LLC (Rtp 85) Research Triangle Park, NC C 0.0
Janssen RandD Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA C 0.0
BeneVir BioPharm Inc Rockville Rockville, MD C 0.0
Taris Lexington Lexington, MA C 0.0
Boston Innovation Center Cambridge Cambridge, MA C 0.0
DM Clinical Research Sugarland Sugarland, TX C 0.0
DM Clinical Research Detroit Southfield, MI C 0.0
DM Clinical Research Tomball Martin Diagnostics Tomball, TX C 0.0
DM Clinical Research Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA C 0.0
DM Clinical Research Bellaire Houston, TX C 0.0
NBS Portage, MI C 0.0
HDT Bio Corp Seattle, WA C 0.0
Genentech New York New York, NY C 0.0
IDT Redwood City Redwood City, CA C 0.0
Ginkgo Bioworks Inc. 45 Moulton St, CMB Cambridge, MA C 0.0
Ginkgo Bioworks Inc. 10 Wilson Road, Cambridge Cambridge, MA C 0.0
iota BioSciences Alameda, CA C 0.0
Ocugen Malvern, PA C 0.0
Janssen RandD Cherry Hill Cherry Hill, NJ C 0.0
Cerenovus Blue Lagoon Miami Miami, FL C 0.0
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in the medical sciences (except nanobiotechnology research and development)?

This sector averages 1.9 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.