Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Tennessee

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City

Johnson City, TN · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City: 4.8 TCR = 126% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City safety composite

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City: 0.0 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.71× in 2020

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City's TCR rose 13.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 13.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Johnson City, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 126% of ind

  • DART 13.0 DART
  • RANK #33/100
  • PHOTO Royal Oaks
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City averages 4.8 TCR (126% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=13 · BLS 3.8

Where Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City (37 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City
Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City (37 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Dominion Senior Living of Johnson City has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 13.0 13.0 0 4 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Johnson City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 177 employers in Johnson City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Oaks 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHS - Towner Crest 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Churchview Supportive Living 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford Derby Memory Care, LLC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville Hatchery 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dyersburg Electric System 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corp 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE RFW CONSTRUCTION GROUP 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Tennessee State University 4,802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson City Medical Center 2,099 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ballad Health 1,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mountain States Health Alliance 1,033 FTE
NAT-TCR Arrow Exterminators Buckhead 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Source 704-Sacramento 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HP - High Performance 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SP Scientific - Stone Ridge, NY 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Doyon Tourism Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soper-Wheeler Company LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4765-AVLPW9667 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Engineering USA / Leased Employees 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.