Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors · Maryland

Donohoe Construction Company

Bethesda, MD · ~186 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Donohoe Construction Company runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Donohoe Construction Company: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Donohoe Construction Company safety composite

Donohoe Construction Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Donohoe Construction Company: 1.7 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2018

Donohoe Construction Company's TCR rose 1.0 from 1.7 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · Bethesda, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO Core General Contrac…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~186 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Core General Contractor Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Donohoe Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Donohoe Construction Company averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Donohoe Construction Company TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Donohoe Construction Company falls in its industry

410 Condominium, multifamily, cons establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Condominium, multifamily, cons employers in Maryland.

Donohoe Construction Company (186 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Donohoe Construction Company
Donohoe Construction Company (186 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Donohoe Construction Company has more employees than the Condominium, multifamily, construction g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.7 2.7 5 0 0
2017 1.7 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · MD · Bethesda

410 Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Core General Contractor Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creative Builders, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR R L Baxter Building 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Fifth Fuel 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Merritt Management Corp - Merritt Construction Services - MD 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia, Herrmann Dr. 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capitol Drywall LLC 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE IKEA #152 Baltimore 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR Wabtec Global Services Kansas City 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5220 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Region 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Vista Grande Villa 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE GGI Glass Distributors Corp dba General Glass International 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior Real Estate Holdings, LLC 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Milwaukee Scrap 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morgan Truck Body LLC- MGA Rydal 186 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.