Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing · Connecticut

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc.

South Windsor, CT · ~330 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc.: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. safety composite

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2021

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. injury rate improved

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.4 from 6.5 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335999 · South Windsor, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Yaskawa Solectria So…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~330 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yaskawa Solectria Solar (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2018=2.4 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. falls in its industry

219 Fuel cells, electrochemical ge establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Fuel cells, electrochemical ge employers in Connecticut.

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. (330 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc.
Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. (330 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. has more employees than the Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 2.1 5 0 0
2020 2.4 2.1 3 5 0
2018 2.4 1.6 7 2 0
2016 6.5 4.4 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335999 · CT · South Windsor

219 Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 117 employers in South Windsor, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yaskawa Solectria Solar 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ESL Power Systems 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEPPI1215 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 403097 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pepperidge Farm Inc. 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE 96920026-4 WE TRANSPORT LLC-WE TRANS - BRIDGEPORT 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carl Robinson Correctional Institution 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cheshire Connecticut 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1223 Swn1000 630 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZSWN 579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broadridge Customer Communications, LLC 571 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Mechanical Services, Inc. 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant SR 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Bank of Central & Eastern North Carolina, 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tar Heel Fresh 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Cameron LNG 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE SONIFI Solutions, Inc. Sioux Falls Office 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairmont Miramar Hotel & Bungalows 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Petroleum Laboratories, Inc. 330 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.