Power converter units (i.e., AC to DC), static, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Yaskawa Solectria Solar

Lawrence, MA · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Yaskawa Solectria Solar runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Power converter units (i.e., AC to DC), static, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Yaskawa Solectria Solar: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Power converter units (i.e., AC to DC), static, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Yaskawa Solectria Solar safety composite

Yaskawa Solectria Solar scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2017→2023

Yaskawa Solectria Solar injury rate improved

Yaskawa Solectria Solar's TCR fell 7.5 from 7.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.5 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335999 · Lawrence, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Doosan Fuel Cell Ame…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Yaskawa Solectria Solar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Yaskawa Solectria Solar averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Power converter units (i.e., AC to DC), static, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Yaskawa Solectria Solar TCR series: 2017=7.5 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Yaskawa Solectria Solar falls in its industry

219 Power converter units (i.e., A establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Power converter units (i.e., A employers in Massachusetts.

Yaskawa Solectria Solar (64 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Yaskawa Solectria Solar
Yaskawa Solectria Solar (64 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 91 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Yaskawa Solectria Solar has fewer employees than the Power converter units (i.e., AC to DC), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2018 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2017 7.5 1.4 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335999 · MA · Lawrence

219 Power converter units (i.e., AC to DC), static, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lawrence, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Doosan Fuel Cell America, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ESL Power Systems 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEPPI1215 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 403097 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE System 7 Wolfers, Inc.-Beverly Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE kleeberg Mechanical Services LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE William F. Lynch Co., Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Transfer & Storage, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAWRENCE GENERAL HOSPITAL 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Manufacturing 728 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Balance Athletics Lawrence Mill 723 FTE
NAT-TCR Burley Middle School 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MCRT2 Hampton 2 Tenant LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR C&B A3 Communications Greenville, SC 702 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Boulder Service Center-205 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salem Store 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kashi Sales Facility 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food 4 Less - Mack Road 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant/Field Departments 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.