Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

Downing Construction Inc

Redlands, CA · ~56 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Downing Construction Inc runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Downing Construction Inc: 2.4 TCR = 86% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Downing Construction Inc safety composite

Downing Construction Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2017→2023

Downing Construction Inc injury rate improved

Downing Construction Inc's TCR fell 9.1 from 9.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Redlands, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #80/201
  • PHOTO Preston Infrastructure
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Preston Infrastructure (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Downing Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Downing Construction Inc averages 2.4 TCR (86% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Downing Construction Inc TCR series: 2017=9.1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Downing Construction Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

Downing Construction Inc (56 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Downing Construction Inc
Downing Construction Inc (56 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Downing Construction Inc has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2017 9.1 4.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Redlands

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 180 employers in Redlands, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Preston Infrastructure 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Development & Construction, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimmins Contracting Corp. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodruff & Sons, Inc.-IN 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burlington Redlands #517 1,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-010 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB4 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB4 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia Ctr Trans Svc Ctr 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KHS USA, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 03-18-02 South Div - Lone Star Region 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 10 Stevens Rd 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wayfield Foods Store 1 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Real Alloy Recycling, LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gurney Trucking, INC Washington, UT 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.