Distribution of electric power · Maryland

DPL- Bay Regional Office

Salisbury, MD · ~260 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DPL- Bay Regional Office runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade B.

DPL- Bay Regional Office: 0.9 TCR = 78% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DPL- Bay Regional Office safety composite

DPL- Bay Regional Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

DPL- Bay Regional Office injury rate improved

DPL- Bay Regional Office's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.7 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Salisbury, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/30
  • PHOTO CenterPoint Energy -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

DPL- Bay Regional Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DPL- Bay Regional Office averages 0.9 TCR (78% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DPL- Bay Regional Office TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 1.2

Where DPL- Bay Regional Office falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 30 Distribution of electric power employers in Maryland.

DPL- Bay Regional Office (260 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DPL- Bay Regional Office
DPL- Bay Regional Office (260 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

DPL- Bay Regional Office has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 3 0 0
2020 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2018 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2016 2.7 1.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MD · Salisbury

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 132 employers in Salisbury, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Northeast District Service Cen 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hendersonville Operations Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Electric Membership Cooperative - 1 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mid Atlantic Baking Co., LLC 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1137 - Frederick 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6340-CAPITALTRISTATE-MD20772-KUPP 261 FTE
STATE-SIZE Towson Town Center 069 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salisbury Plant 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-PD 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Salisbury 430 FTE
NAT-TCR San Jose 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritas Document Solutions 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 102843 - Rondout West Branch Bypass Water Tunnel 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR San Antonio Store #2203 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Las Vegas Arena Owner llc 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise Horizon 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Products Company Inc 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis 79th Street 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.