Electric Services · Texas

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex

Houston, TX · ~376 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Services workplace, earning a grade B.

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex: 0.9 TCR = 78% of Electric Services BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex safety composite

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex: 0.6 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2020 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 78% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #52/246
  • PHOTO DPL- Bay Regional Of…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~376 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPL- Bay Regional Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex averages 0.9 TCR (78% of the Electric Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex TCR series: 2020=0.6 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 1.2

Where CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Services establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 246 Electric Services employers in Texas.

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex (376 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex
CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex (376 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex has more employees than the Electric Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 5 0 0
2023 1.3 1.0 5 0 0
2022 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2020 0.6 0.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TX · Houston

2,958 Electric Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPL- Bay Regional Office 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Northeast District Service Cen 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hendersonville Operations Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Electric Membership Cooperative - 1 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaneka North America LLC 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Lufkin (1551) 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE 546 376 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2993 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Navy Federal Credit Un 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kensington Camp 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lorien Mt. Airy 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Preferred Construction Services, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marshalltown - Arkansas Facilities 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento CA FXFE-SAC 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advertising Specialty Institute 376 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cosma Body Assembly Michigan 376 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.