Electric Power Distribution · North Carolina

Hendersonville Operations Center

Hendersonville, NC · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hendersonville Operations Center runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

Hendersonville Operations Center: 0.9 TCR = 78% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hendersonville Operations Center safety composite

Hendersonville Operations Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2024

Hendersonville Operations Center injury rate improved

Hendersonville Operations Center's TCR fell 5.9 from 5.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Hendersonville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/107
  • PHOTO DPL- Bay Regional Of…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPL- Bay Regional Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hendersonville Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hendersonville Operations Center averages 0.9 TCR (78% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hendersonville Operations Center TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Hendersonville Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 107 Electric Power Distribution employers in North Carolina.

Hendersonville Operations Center (41 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hendersonville Operations Center
Hendersonville Operations Center (41 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Hendersonville Operations Center has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 5.9 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NC · Hendersonville

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 90 employers in Hendersonville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPL- Bay Regional Office 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy - South Houston Complex 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Northeast District Service Cen 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Electric Membership Cooperative - 1 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Barnes LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandhill Turf 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewiston NC Operation 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain Electric Coop Newland 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Ridge Health 1,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Hendersonville 788 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1242 402 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1242 400 FTE
NAT-TCR Energy Svc-MMWEC 60 MW Simple 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 075 - Half Moon Bay Ca 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Protolabs - Plymouth 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Odessa Tx - 835 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Odessa Transmission Operations 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maryville 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway LLC - Texas Petrochemical Company - Houston 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - SEMO Division North 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.