Distribution of electric power · Maryland

DPL- North East District Office

North East, MD · ~55 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DPL- North East District Office runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

DPL- North East District Office: 1.6 TCR = 133% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DPL- North East District Office safety composite

DPL- North East District Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

DPL- North East District Office injury rate improved

DPL- North East District Office's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · North East, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.6 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/30
  • PHOTO LEOMINSTER-MA16
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEOMINSTER-MA16 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

DPL- North East District Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DPL- North East District Office averages 1.6 TCR (133% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DPL- North East District Office TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where DPL- North East District Office falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 30 Distribution of electric power employers in Maryland.

DPL- North East District Office (55 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DPL- North East District Office
DPL- North East District Office (55 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

DPL- North East District Office has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MD · North East

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 35 employers in North East, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEOMINSTER-MA16 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Electric Cooperative 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garner Operations Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owen Electric Cooperative 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Great Day Baltimore 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baltimore Warehouse 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stormwater Maintenance LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jessup FS (SSS,SAT) 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDT2 1,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDT2 609 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5450 403 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5450 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0071 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 162-Dallas Renaissance 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford County Department of Social Services - Greensboro 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Climatec LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Redondo Manufacturing 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE MGM Resorts International Design and Development 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roseville LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleburne Distribution 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.