Electric Power Distribution · North Carolina

Garner Operations Center

Raleigh, NC · ~70 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garner Operations Center runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Garner Operations Center: 1.6 TCR = 133% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garner Operations Center safety composite

Garner Operations Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Garner Operations Center injury rate improved

Garner Operations Center's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.6 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/107
  • PHOTO DPL- North East Dist…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPL- North East District Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Garner Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garner Operations Center averages 1.6 TCR (133% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garner Operations Center TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Garner Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 107 Electric Power Distribution employers in North Carolina.

Garner Operations Center (70 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Garner Operations Center
Garner Operations Center (70 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Garner Operations Center has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 2.7 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NC · Raleigh

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPL- North East District Office 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEOMINSTER-MA16 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Electric Cooperative 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owen Electric Cooperative 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE SHARP FARM INC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson Farming Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACT Power Services, LLC 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Hershey 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaboard Foods Lp Iowa Falls Fm Delivery 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LTAC of Louisiana LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Value Added Packaging, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kellogg Ave Operations Facility 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valiant Living Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Facility 510 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Northern S - IL Electric Ops 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.