Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Minnesota

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC

Minneapolis, MN · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC: 4.0 TCR = 62% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC safety composite

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC held a steady TCR band

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.2 in 2023 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.2 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #16/113
  • PHOTO 79360000
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 79360000 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dream Chasers Logistics LLC averages 4.0 TCR (62% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC TCR series: 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Dream Chasers Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 113 Express delivery services (exc employers in Minnesota.

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC (55 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Dream Chasers Logistics LLC
Dream Chasers Logistics LLC (55 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Dream Chasers Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MN · Minneapolis

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 79360000 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DFW8 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI5 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A3 Logistics 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Langhorst Pork, Inc. 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gemko of Forest Lake dba WDI Company 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE FCO Echo 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melrose, MN (Arvig) 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Families in Recovery Program 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Las Vegas 10172 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MALDEN-MA19 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maddox Air & Electrical 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Products Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wallace Forge Company 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swisher County Cattle Company 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacproinc, LLC 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.