Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Pennsylvania

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture

Blue Bell, PA · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade F.

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture: 6.5 TCR = 232% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture safety composite

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2016→2018

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture injury rate improved

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture's TCR fell 10.5 from 10.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.5 · 2017=9.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Blue Bell, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 232% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #164/196
  • PHOTO NEL Corp Middleton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEL Corp Middleton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture averages 6.5 TCR (232% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture TCR series: 2016=10.5 · 2017=9 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 196 Construction management, highw employers in Pennsylvania.

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture (36 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture
Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture (36 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Driscoll/Pierson Joint Venture has fewer employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.0 9.0 4 0 0
2016 10.5 7.0 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Blue Bell

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 56 employers in Blue Bell, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEL Corp Middleton 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KALIN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CUSTOM PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR D2 Amboy Yard 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouses, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altoona 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Penn Natural Gas Williamsport 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS - PA - Fairless Hills 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Blue Bell - Power 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Blue Bell 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Normandy Farms Estates 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR BT Blue Bell 256 FTE
NAT-TCR Fischer Point 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Windmill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vern Eide Ford 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Vista Healthcare Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE MaineGeneral Rehab & Long Term Care - Alzheimers Care Center 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lex Rd 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tomra Western BICS 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linde - Buffalo 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.