Flight simulation machinery manufacturing · Utah

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc.

Salt Lake City, UT · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flight simulation machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Flight simulation machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2022→2023

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P72
  • PHOTO Hydranautics
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydranautics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Flight simulation machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2022=3 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

361 Flight simulation machinery ma establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc.
Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Driver Training Systems, a division of L3 Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Flight simulation machinery manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · UT · Salt Lake City

361 Flight simulation machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydranautics 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Balancing Company, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Selecto 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henny Penny 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Face Contracting, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland Electric 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salt Lake City, UT HVAC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Artisan Millwork LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Lantern Press Seattle 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elco Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tower Eight Staffing Solutions dba Labor For Hire - Miami 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2434 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE DEJ Holdings, LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Service Center-5B 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmark Patterns, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply-Odessa 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.