Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing · Ohio

Henny Penny

Eaton, OH · ~789 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Henny Penny runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Henny Penny: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Henny Penny safety composite

Henny Penny scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Henny Penny injury rate improved

Henny Penny's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Eaton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #9/24
  • PHOTO Dexter Laundry Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 95 inj
  • SIZE ~789 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dexter Laundry Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Henny Penny in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Henny Penny averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Henny Penny TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Henny Penny falls in its industry

361 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryer establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 24 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryer employers in Ohio.

Henny Penny (789 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Henny Penny
Henny Penny (789 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Henny Penny has more employees than the Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 4 0 0
2023 0.4 0.3 4 0 0
2022 3.3 2.3 25 12 0
2021 1.1 0.5 10 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 2 9 0
2019 1.3 0.8 11 0 0
2018 1.5 0.5 12 0 0
2017 1.3 0.4 9 0 0
2016 2.9 0.7 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · OH · Eaton

361 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 20 employers in Eaton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dexter Laundry Inc 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BUNN - Ash Grove 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mar Cor Purification - Manufacturing MN 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pentair Filtration Solutions, LLC - Hanover Park 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CompuNet Clinical Laboratories 789 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gorilla Glue Company - Tri County 788 FTE
STATE-SIZE EATON CENTER OH 788 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Intelligrated - OH0K 787 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPM 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing Inc. 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5374 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Laredo LAR 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Skanska Granite Lane JV - SGL Constructors (I4) 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison Forms LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc. WV Hanger 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. 789 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burnsville 789 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 789 FTE
NAT-SIZE FL_Auburndale_1004 US Highway 92W_00610106 789 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.