Automotive, truck and bus steering assemblies and parts manufacturing · Michigan

Dura Automotive Systems

Fremont, MI · ~164 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dura Automotive Systems runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automotive, truck and bus steering assemblies and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dura Automotive Systems: 2.2 TCR = 41% of Automotive, truck and bus steering assemblies and parts manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dura Automotive Systems safety composite

Dura Automotive Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dura Automotive Systems held a steady TCR band

Dura Automotive Systems's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.2 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336330 · Fremont, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 41% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #14/35
  • PHOTO F&P Georgia MFG
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: F&P Georgia MFG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dura Automotive Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dura Automotive Systems averages 2.2 TCR (41% of the Automotive, truck and bus steering assemblies and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dura Automotive Systems TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.2 · BLS 5.4

Where Dura Automotive Systems falls in its industry

134 Automotive, truck and bus stee establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 35 Automotive, truck and bus stee employers in Michigan.

Dura Automotive Systems (164 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 192 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dura Automotive Systems
Dura Automotive Systems (164 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 192 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Dura Automotive Systems has fewer employees than the Automotive, truck and bus steering assem median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336330 · MI · Fremont

134 Automotive, truck and bus steering assemblies and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 19 employers in Fremont, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR F&P Georgia MFG 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Astemo Berea Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canton R&D 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sachse Construction 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zoetis GMS South 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE 464 - Pharmacy Central Fill #2 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Castings LLC - Ludington 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerber Products - Fremont Plant 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Gerber Products Company 496 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPECTRUM HEALTH GERBER 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1791 291 FTE
NAT-TCR 0160 - Canton, OH 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR US - Supply Chain : 0002 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosev Dairy Foods, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Colby, Wi 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trig's Stevens Point 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bryan Center (Txbrn) 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE 18 Martin 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodrich - Customer Service 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.