Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing · Texas

DWD International

Houston, TX · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DWD International runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

DWD International: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DWD International safety composite

DWD International scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2022

DWD International injury rate improved

DWD International's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #4/52
  • PHOTO Johnson Controls- Wi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson Controls- Wichita Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DWD International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DWD International averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DWD International TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where DWD International falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning equipment (ex establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 52 Air-conditioning equipment (ex employers in Texas.

DWD International (52 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DWD International
DWD International (52 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

DWD International has fewer employees than the Air-conditioning equipment (except motor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · TX · Houston

461 Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson Controls- Wichita Site 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Charlotte (CCOE), NC-USA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2326_4368 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drake Refrigeration 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE KR SGHS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feeders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hale Center Feedyard 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Idalou Egg Ranch LP 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardinal IG -IG Tech Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vertellus - Indianapolis 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Quiring General 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GD USA Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific Drayage Services - Tracy 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga - 10 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA103 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE NM006 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.