Pig farming · South Dakota

Dylbrook

Canistota, SD · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Dylbrook runs at 365% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pig farming workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
avg TCR · per 100 workers
4.5
industry benchmark (BLS)
10
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Dylbrook's OSHA Total Case Rate of 16.4 to the Pig farming BLS benchmark of 4.5 (365% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Dylbrook's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.

05101520 20182019 18.24.5 Industry benchmarkDylbrook TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 112210.

Where Dylbrook falls in its industry

298 Pig farming establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Pig farming employers in South Dakota.

Trend analysis for Dylbrook

Between 2018 and 2019, Dylbrook's Total Case Rate worsened from 14.7 to 18.2 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 24% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 14.7, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 18.2, a spread of 3.5 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Dylbrook recorded 10 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 10 injuries shown on this page for Dylbrook are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 112210 - Pig farming.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

6 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 65,936 hours worked = 18.20 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Dylbrook (this establishment) 16.44 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming industry avg 4.50 BLS IIF, NAICS 112210
South Dakota state avg (all industries) 5.84 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Dylbrook to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 18.2 18.2 6 0 0
2018 14.7 14.7 4 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Dylbrook's reported OSHA injury record versus its Pig farming peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 365% of the Pig farming benchmark, Dylbrook reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Pig farming sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dylbrook's safety grade?
Dylbrook has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 16.4 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 4.5 for Pig farming.
How many injuries has Dylbrook reported?
Dylbrook has reported 10 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2019, 2018). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within South Dakota, and by nearby establishments in Canistota - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.