Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing · New York

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill

Poestenkill, NY · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill: 1.4 TCR = 44% of Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill safety composite

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill held a steady TCR band

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.3 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Poestenkill, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #12/16
  • PHOTO Montana Instruments
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Montana Instruments (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill falls in its industry

128 Fatigue testing machines, indu establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 16 Fatigue testing machines, indu employers in New York.

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill
Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill (47 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill has fewer employees than the Fatigue testing machines, industrial, me median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · NY · Poestenkill

128 Fatigue testing machines, industrial, mechanical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 employers in Poestenkill, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Montana Instruments 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 40 Hercules Drive--Polhemus Headquarters 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evident Scientific NDT Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aero Systems Engineering, Inc 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Bliss, NY 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brightly Farms, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Jacket Orchards 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barbland Dairy LLC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dynamic Systems INC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Gobain 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, Poestenkill, NY 38 FTE
NAT-TCR East Machias Maine 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bravo! Building Services Regional Bbsde 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hale Anuenue Restorative Care Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DBA Ashley Furniture Homestores- Roseville 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mundy Support Services LLC Job #34335 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sabino Recovery - Tucson 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayfield - Chatanooga 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walling Distributing Company, Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.