Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing · Minnesota

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc

Name: Aero Systems Engineering, Inc Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Saint Paul, MN · ~213 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc safety composite

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc held a steady TCR band

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.5 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.5 · 2019=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Saint Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

DART 0.5 DART
RANK #4/5
PHOTO Dynamic Systems Inc.…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.5
MN157 MOCON, I

1.5
Dynamic System

1.4
Montana Instru

1.4
40 Hercules Dr

1.4

What this shows Aero Systems Engineering, Inc averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc TCR series: 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Aero Systems Engineering, Inc falls in its industry

128 Aircraft engine instruments ma establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Aircraft engine instruments ma employers in Minnesota.

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc (213 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc has more employees than the Aircraft engine instruments manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2019	1.5	0.5	3	0	0
2018	1.5	0.5	2	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · MN · Saint Paul

128 Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill	POESTENKILL, NY	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MN157 MOCON, INC.	BROOKLYN PARK, MN	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Montana Instruments	BOZEMAN, MT	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	40 Hercules Drive--Polhemus Headquarters	COLCHESTER, VT	1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Anderson Brothers Construction	BRAINERD	213 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Installed Building Solutions	FARMINGTON	213 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Thermotech	HOPKINS	213 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Stratasys (NASH)	EDEN PRAIRIE	213 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HE-Midway Corporate Campus	Saint Paul	2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Department of Public Safety	Saint Paul	2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule	Saint Paul	1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR	FV St Josephs Hospital	Saint Paul	1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR	Steam Turbine Alternative Resources, Inc.	Marion, OH	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Church & Dwight Co., Inc. - Virginia	South Chesterfield, VA	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Colorworks	Gilbertsville, PA	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	JCB Laboratories	Wichita, KS	1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Meijer Store 287	Evansville, IN	213 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hmc P-2	Bay Springs, MS	213 FTE
NAT-SIZE	FedEx Supply Chain - Fulfillment Greenwood	Greenwood, IN	213 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Renown Rehabilatation Hospital 410	Reno, NV	213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.