Trucking, general freight, local · Maryland

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury

Salisbury, MD · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trucking, general freight, local workplace, earning a grade C.

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury: 3.7 TCR = 83% of Trucking, general freight, local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury safety composite

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2021

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury injury rate improved

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Salisbury, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/58
  • PHOTO New Orleans
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Orleans (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury averages 3.7 TCR (83% of the Trucking, general freight, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury falls in its industry

2,784 Trucking, general freight, loc establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 58 Trucking, general freight, loc employers in Maryland.

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury (43 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury
Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury (43 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Eagle Transport Corporation - Salisbury has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 8.2 8.2 5 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2016 5.8 5.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · MD · Salisbury

2,784 Trucking, general freight, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 132 employers in Salisbury, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Orleans 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HLC Trucking Co 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ace Corporate Support 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reilley Trucking Inc. 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beltsville Warehouse 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE CBG 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Banneker Ventures 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Coast Building Services LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salisbury Plant 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-PD-SBY-SALISBURY-PD 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Salisbury 430 FTE
NAT-TCR Owensboro Grain Edible Oils 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR pINE FOREST HEALTH AND REHA 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Equipment Corp. dba Bobcat of Tampa 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PCI INDUSTRIES (Pottorff) 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plasma Processes 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3rd Street Memphis Langston Bags 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heath Oil 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE TCSC Hatfield Plant 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.