Alkaline cell storage batteries (i.e., nickel-cadmium, nickel-iron, silver oxide-zinc) manufacturing · Massachusetts

EaglePicher Technologies

Southbridge, MA · ~73 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EaglePicher Technologies runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alkaline cell storage batteries (i.e., nickel-cadmium, nickel-iron, silver oxide-zinc) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

EaglePicher Technologies: 1.4 TCR = 44% of Alkaline cell storage batteries (i.e., nickel-cadmium, nickel-iron, silver oxide-zinc) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EaglePicher Technologies safety composite

EaglePicher Technologies scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

EaglePicher Technologies: 0.0 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.99× in 2024

EaglePicher Technologies's TCR rose 4.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 4.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335911 · Southbridge, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Johnson Controls Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson Controls Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

EaglePicher Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EaglePicher Technologies averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Alkaline cell storage batteries (i.e., nickel-cadmium, nickel-iron, silver oxide-zinc) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EaglePicher Technologies TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where EaglePicher Technologies falls in its industry

161 Alkaline cell storage batterie establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Alkaline cell storage batterie employers in Massachusetts.

EaglePicher Technologies (73 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate EaglePicher Technologies
EaglePicher Technologies (73 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1

EaglePicher Technologies has fewer employees than the Alkaline cell storage batteries (i.e., n median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 4.3 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335911 · MA · Southbridge

161 Alkaline cell storage batteries (i.e., nickel-cadmium, nickel-iron, silver oxide-zinc) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 33 employers in Southbridge, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson Controls Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR XALT Energy Midland 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EaglePicher Technologies - C Street 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middletown DE DC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Merrit Construction 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE GVW Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Massachusetts - Oxford 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warner Brothers 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrington Memorial Hospital 1,349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrington Physician Services 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Center of Hope Foundation, Inc. 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southbridge Main Location 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Lanzen, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Branch 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Republic services of Denver 4535 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR International Paper Eaton Container 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nighthawk Custom LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peco InspX 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Township Senior Living 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE ElectroSolutions, Inc. 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.