Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Washington Township Senior Living

Sewell, NJ · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Washington Township Senior Living runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Washington Township Senior Living: 2.0 TCR = 53% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Washington Township Senior Living safety composite

Washington Township Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Washington Township Senior Living: 1.6 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Washington Township Senior Living's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.6 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sewell, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/125
  • PHOTO 63106 SUNRISE OF GAR…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 63106 SUNRISE OF GARDNER PARK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Washington Township Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Washington Township Senior Living averages 2.0 TCR (53% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Washington Township Senior Living TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Washington Township Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Washington Township Senior Living (73 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Washington Township Senior Living
Washington Township Senior Living (73 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Washington Township Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.1 2.0 1 1 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Sewell

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 47 employers in Sewell, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 63106 SUNRISE OF GARDNER PARK 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Wright Park 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Grove Park 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Faye Wright Senior Living 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas Glassboro 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-NJ-Blackwood-Lower Landing Road 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lucas Construction Group, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.E. PIERSON CONSTRUCTION - DE 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Center Square LLC 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Center Square Supermarket LLC 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ray Angelini Inc. 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Health Care Center - Formerly Kennedy Health Care Center 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Federal Fire Protection 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bentley Builders LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Home Healthcare Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Automatic Sprinkler Co., Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ElectroSolutions, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peco InspX 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nighthawk Custom LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Verandah 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.