Water supply systems · California

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water

Oakland, CA · ~1,602 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water runs at 438% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water supply systems workplace, earning a grade F.

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water: 5.3 TCR = 438% of Water supply systems BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water safety composite

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2017→2019

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water injury rate improved

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water's TCR fell 2.1 from 6.0 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.0 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Oakland, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 438% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #99/176
  • PHOTO WVWA Crystal Spring
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 201 inj
  • SIZE ~1,602 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WVWA Crystal Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water averages 5.3 TCR (438% of the Water supply systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water TCR series: 2017=6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 1.2

Where East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water falls in its industry

727 Water supply systems establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 176 Water supply systems employers in California.

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water (1,602 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water
East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water (1,602 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water has more employees than the Water supply systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 2.4 60 9 0
2018 5.9 3.8 74 10 0
2017 6.0 3.4 67 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Oakland

727 Water supply systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 458 employers in Oakland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WVWA Crystal Spring 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montecito Water District 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Utility District No. 1 of Thurston County 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aqua Ohio, Inc. - Mentor 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rachma Contracting, Inc. 1,600 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 179 1,600 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 187 1,600 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 185 1,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland Unified School District 4,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120301 4,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620301 3,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02620301 2,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Bristol Store 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Essi, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TriMark Adams Burch 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaspar Manufacturing 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations 1,602 FTE
NAT-SIZE UnityPoint Health-Trinity 1,602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battelle Columbus Operations 1,601 FTE
NAT-SIZE Angels In Your Home 1,601 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.