Servicing oil and gas wells on a contract basis · Texas

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations

Midland, TX · ~1,602 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Servicing oil and gas wells on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade A.

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations: 0.9 TCR = 46% of Servicing oil and gas wells on a contract basis BLS 1.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations safety composite

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations held a steady TCR band

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #100/196
  • PHOTO 0072-HES Williston
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 92 inj
  • SIZE ~1,602 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 0072-HES Williston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations averages 0.9 TCR (46% of the Servicing oil and gas wells on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.8 · BLS 1.9

Where ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations falls in its industry

467 Servicing oil and gas wells on establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 196 Servicing oil and gas wells on employers in Texas.

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations (1,602 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations
ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations (1,602 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

ProPetro Services -- Permian Operations has more employees than the Servicing oil and gas wells on a contrac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.8 0.1 40 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 26 0 0
2017 1.0 0.3 18 1 0
2016 0.8 0.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · TX · Midland

467 Servicing oil and gas wells on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 0072-HES Williston 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA Compression Partners - Gulf Coast 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MelCo, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Canton 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist San Jacinto Hospital (Baytown, TX) 1,603 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood 1,604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Methodist West Hospital (Katy, TX) 1,597 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilcorp Energy Company 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR JR Simplot Company-Helm Plant 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ingram Micro Mobility Airtech 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Thor Motor Coach/850 wire harness 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NGMS-B340 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE East Bay Municipal Utility District - Water 1,602 FTE
NAT-SIZE UnityPoint Health-Trinity 1,602 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battelle Columbus Operations 1,601 FTE
NAT-SIZE Angels In Your Home 1,601 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.