Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Kentucky

East Bend Generating Station

Union, KY · ~92 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Bend Generating Station runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

East Bend Generating Station: 0.7 TCR = 54% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Bend Generating Station safety composite

East Bend Generating Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

East Bend Generating Station injury rate improved

East Bend Generating Station's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Union, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/23
  • PHOTO Neal Energy Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Neal Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

East Bend Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Bend Generating Station averages 0.7 TCR (54% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Bend Generating Station TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=1 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where East Bend Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 23 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Kentucky.

East Bend Generating Station (92 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate East Bend Generating Station
East Bend Generating Station (92 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

East Bend Generating Station has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · KY · Union

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 9 employers in Union, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Neal Energy Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Gateway Generating Station 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blythe Energy Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandywine 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Judy Construction Company 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frederick & May Construction 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daicel Safety Systems Americas INC (Gas Generant Division) 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ingevity - Wickliffe Carbon Plant 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR 014-00454 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boonespring 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR StoryPoint Union 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR 491-DC002 64 FTE
NAT-TCR Specialty Materials 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 8027656 Nike Centerpointe 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Vinvale 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta 03 HIS 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE JB Duke Hotel 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabricators Supply LLC 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brand Scaffold Services Inc. - Torrance Refinery 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Creek Post Acute 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.