Civic & Social Organization · North Carolina

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle

Clayton, NC · ~122 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle runs at 379% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Civic & Social Organization workplace, earning a grade F.

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle: 8.0 TCR = 379% of Civic & Social Organization BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle safety composite

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2021→2024

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle injury rate improved

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle's TCR fell 10.9 from 10.9 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 881.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.9 · 2022=881.1 · 2023=13.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Clayton, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 379% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/31
  • PHOTO Briargate Family YMCA
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Briargate Family YMCA (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle averages 8.0 TCR (379% of the Civic & Social Organization BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle TCR series: 2021=10.9 · 2022=881.1 · 2023=13 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle falls in its industry

298 Civic & Social Organization establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 31 Civic & Social Organization employers in North Carolina.

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle (122 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle
East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle (122 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

East Triangle - Ymca of the Triangle has more employees than the Civic & Social Organization median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 13.0 0.0 4 0 0
2022 881.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 10.9 0.0 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · NC · Clayton

298 Civic & Social Organization employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Clayton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Briargate Family YMCA 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lansdale Area Family YMCA 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grove City YMCA 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birchwood Farms Golf and Country Club 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Operations 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Concord Water Services 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utili-Serve LLC 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Granite Contracting LLC 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC (CLAYTON) 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFP Clayton 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSAM DAPI-US 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP 644 FTE
NAT-TCR Thousand Oaks Post Acute 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mira Mesa 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Abbott House 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Ridge Assisted Living of Hastings 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Polr Furnishings LLC dba Kaemark 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yargus Manufacturing, Inc. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denison Industries (Main Foundry) 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Molded Products a division of Atlas Roofing Corporation 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.