Distribution of electric power · Wisconsin

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative

Fall Creek, WI · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative runs at 530% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative: 6.4 TCR = 530% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative safety composite

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative held a steady TCR band

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative's TCR held near 0.0 from 6.1 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=16.6 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Fall Creek, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 530% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #50/61
  • PHOTO AMEREN MISSOURI - We…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMEREN MISSOURI - Wentzville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eau Claire Energy Cooperative averages 6.4 TCR (530% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=3 · 2020=16.6 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Eau Claire Energy Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 61 Distribution of electric power employers in Wisconsin.

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative (35 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eau Claire Energy Cooperative
Eau Claire Energy Cooperative (35 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eau Claire Energy Cooperative has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2023 6.4 0.0 0 2 0
2022 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2021 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2020 16.6 6.7 1 4 0
2019 3.0 0.0 0 1 0
2018 6.3 0.0 0 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.1 3.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · WI · Fall Creek

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 5 employers in Fall Creek, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Wentzville 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR McLeod Cooperative Power 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABITA SPRINGS 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah Operating 3102 Kilowatt Dr Savannah 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE C00280-Josheph Campbell CO Milwaukee WI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rite Hite 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Royal Construction, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Imperia Foods - Fall Creek 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schuman Cheese DBA Imperia Foods Inc. 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mail Source 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Badger Unified Cooperative Services 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Lax Los Angeles Airport 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1748 LKQ Prefered Auto Parts 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dun-lap Manufacturing Company 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dothan - 28 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1023 - BELFOR Virginia Beach VA 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arkell Hall Foundation, Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 260-Grand Rapids 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 640-Columbus 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.