General Warehousing and Storage · Wisconsin

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740

Eau Claire, WI · ~109 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740: 2.9 TCR = 50% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 safety composite

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2024

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 injury rate improved

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740's TCR fell 1.8 from 5.4 in 2018 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.4 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Eau Claire, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 50% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #64/195
  • PHOTO Mesquite RSC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mesquite RSC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 averages 2.9 TCR (50% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 TCR series: 2018=5.4 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 195 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Wisconsin.

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 (109 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eau Claire Transportation - 3740
Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 (109 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Eau Claire Transportation - 3740 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2023 4.8 3.6 4 0 0
2022 3.4 1.1 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.4 1.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · WI · Eau Claire

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 271 employers in Eau Claire, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mesquite RSC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadows 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA PA Fredericksburg DSC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-CA-Livermore-800 Atlantis Street-Warehouse 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michels Power Inc-WI-Lomira 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mule Hide Manufacturing 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thysse 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Precision Pipeline, LLC 3,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Hospital (Whipple) 3,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WWD Sacred Heart Hospital 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR STORE DIVISION ADMIN - 3019 900 FTE
NAT-TCR WTPS Ghent 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR R&W Contracting, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DIS-TRAN Steel - Ohio 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eversource - Marshfield 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Portland - CR 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madera 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rae-Ann Westlake 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE PRIDE Electric 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.