Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Minnesota

Ecumen North Branch

North Branch, MN · ~138 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ecumen North Branch runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Ecumen North Branch: 12.5 TCR = 192% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ecumen North Branch safety composite

Ecumen North Branch scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2017→2024

Ecumen North Branch injury rate improved

Ecumen North Branch's TCR fell 4.6 from 12.7 in 2017 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.7 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · North Branch, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.5 · 192% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #328/430
  • PHOTO Minnequa Medicenter
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnequa Medicenter (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ecumen North Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ecumen North Branch averages 12.5 TCR (192% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ecumen North Branch TCR series: 2017=12.7 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=10.8 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Ecumen North Branch falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #328 safest of 430 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Minnesota.

Ecumen North Branch (138 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ecumen North Branch
Ecumen North Branch (138 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ecumen North Branch has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 8.1 7 0 0
2023 5.7 2.8 4 0 0
2022 20.9 20.9 8 7 0
2021 15.8 15.8 4 8 0
2019 10.8 10.8 12 0 0
2018 13.3 12.2 10 2 0
2017 12.7 10.6 10 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · North Branch

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 30 employers in North Branch, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnequa Medicenter 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lehigh Commons 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seneca House 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harry Hynes Memorial Hospice - Inpatient Unit 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waymouth Farms Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abdallah Candies Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernicks Pepsi of Duluth 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chaska B2 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Branch Extrusion - CORP 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Andersen Corporation - North Branch 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market North Branch - 5609 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Branch County Market - 5609 89 FTE
NAT-TCR 241 McKinney 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilltop Inn 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of NIttany Valley 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Puget Sound Regional Fire Authority 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilmington Management Company 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Power City Electric 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stellar Technology Inc. 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Downey Post Acute 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.