Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing · Minnesota

Andersen Corporation - North Branch

North Branch, MN · ~195 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Andersen Corporation - North Branch runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Andersen Corporation - North Branch: 3.3 TCR = 99% of Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Andersen Corporation - North Branch safety composite

Andersen Corporation - North Branch scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Andersen Corporation - North Branch held a steady TCR band

Andersen Corporation - North Branch's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.3 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2020=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · North Branch, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 99% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #40/89
  • PHOTO Bilco Company Zanesv…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bilco Company Zanesville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Andersen Corporation - North Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Andersen Corporation - North Branch averages 3.3 TCR (99% of the Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Andersen Corporation - North Branch TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2020=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Andersen Corporation - North Branch falls in its industry

2,838 Windows and window frames, pla establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 89 Windows and window frames, pla employers in Minnesota.

Andersen Corporation - North Branch (195 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Andersen Corporation - North Branch
Andersen Corporation - North Branch (195 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Andersen Corporation - North Branch has more employees than the Windows and window frames, plastics, man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.3 2.2 6 0 0
2017 3.3 1.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MN · North Branch

2,838 Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 30 employers in North Branch, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bilco Company Zanesville 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Salem 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AmesburyTruth - Cannon Falls 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecore International - York 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dakota Electric Association 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saputo Cheese USA, Inc. 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wells Concrete, Wells 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nonin Medical 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Branch Extrusion - CORP 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ecumen North Branch 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market North Branch - 5609 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Branch County Market - 5609 89 FTE
NAT-TCR GH Phipps Construction 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gopher Ridge Grove 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UTC Railcar Repair Services - Texarkana, AR 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR LECO Corporation- Consumables 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northwestern Medicine Home Health & Hospice 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ergon-West Virginia, Inc 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.R. Laine Furniture 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renewable Water Resources 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.