Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Delaware

Edge Moor Power Plant

Wilmington, DE · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edge Moor Power Plant runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Edge Moor Power Plant: 0.6 TCR = 52% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edge Moor Power Plant safety composite

Edge Moor Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Edge Moor Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Edge Moor Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Wilmington, DE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.6 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Coughlin Power Station
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coughlin Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Delaware employers → · Look up another →

Edge Moor Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edge Moor Power Plant averages 0.6 TCR (52% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edge Moor Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Edge Moor Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Delaware alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Delaware.

Edge Moor Power Plant (32 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Edge Moor Power Plant
Edge Moor Power Plant (32 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Edge Moor Power Plant has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · DE · Wilmington

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,487 rated employers in Delaware with headcount on file · 309 employers in Wilmington, DE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coughlin Power Station 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cayuga Generating Station 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR JH Campbell Annex 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FRESH MEADOW POWER / NE, LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Leon N. Weiner & Associates, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-DE-Seaford-Ventura Drive 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kinetic Systems Inc. DuPont Delaware 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gardner-Gibson Seaford 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 Wilmington 9,107 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Commercial Field-Based Personnel) 4,907 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN1 3,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hatzel & Buehler, Inc. 1,841 FTE
NAT-TCR Premier Power Maintenance Corp 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 160 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabot Haverhill 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR KCT - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Opelika OPK 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincroft / Red Bank Courtyard By Marriott 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fore River Energy Center 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fleet Services 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.