Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · South Dakota

Edgewood Rapid City

Rapid City, SD · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Rapid City runs at 472% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edgewood Rapid City: 17.9 TCR = 472% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Rapid City safety composite

Edgewood Rapid City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.5

2019→2024

Edgewood Rapid City injury rate improved

Edgewood Rapid City's TCR fell 23.5 from 35.0 in 2019 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=35.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=36.7 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=11.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Rapid City, SD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.9 · 472% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #18/22
  • PHOTO The Village at Germa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Village at Germantown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Rapid City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Rapid City averages 17.9 TCR (472% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edgewood Rapid City TCR series: 2019=35 · 2020=2 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=36.7 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Rapid City falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 22 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Dakota.

Edgewood Rapid City (60 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Rapid City
Edgewood Rapid City (60 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Edgewood Rapid City has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 7.7 6 0 0
2023 9.8 9.8 3 1 0
2022 36.7 34.4 1 15 0
2021 12.8 6.4 5 1 0
2020 2.0 2.0 0 1 0
2019 35.0 8.2 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SD · Rapid City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 219 employers in Rapid City, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Village at Germantown 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glen Park at Monrovia 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wabash Christian Village 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Overland Park Management, LLC 18.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Star Logistics, LLC Lake Norden 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison Facility 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE DALE'S TIRE & RETREADING, INC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pivotal Fab and Powder 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rapid City Hospital 2,320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Black Hills Works 683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Black Hills Corp. Headquarters (SD006) 590 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1604 513 FTE
NAT-TCR AZT014 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrive Palm Springs 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oficina Municipal del Manejo de Emergencias 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Last Mile Deliveries LLC 17.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seats Richalnd Center Division 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE S&H Machine Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bar ALE, Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE HQ 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.