Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing · South Dakota

Madison Facility

Madison, SD · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Madison Facility runs at 397% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Madison Facility: 13.1 TCR = 397% of Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Madison Facility safety composite

Madison Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

Madison Facility injury rate improved

Madison Facility's TCR fell 1.9 from 12.1 in 2016 to 10.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 26.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.1 · 2017=26.9 · 2018=13.5 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=10.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Madison, SD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 397% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Avanti Windows & Doo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avanti Windows & Doors (Texas) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Madison Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Madison Facility averages 13.1 TCR (397% of the Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Madison Facility TCR series: 2016=12.1 · 2017=26.9 · 2018=13.5 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=7.7 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Madison Facility falls in its industry

2,838 Windows and window frames, pla establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Windows and window frames, pla employers in South Dakota.

Madison Facility (60 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Madison Facility
Madison Facility (60 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Madison Facility has fewer employees than the Windows and window frames, plastics, man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.2 8.1 5 0 0
2023 15.9 9.9 8 0 0
2022 7.7 2.6 3 0 0
2021 12.1 4.0 6 0 0
2020 6.5 2.2 3 0 0
2018 13.5 6.7 8 0 0
2017 26.9 10.8 14 1 0
2016 12.1 6.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · SD · Madison

2,838 Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 26 employers in Madison, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avanti Windows & Doors (Texas) 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aggressive Industries Inc - North Plant 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Latham Autocovers - Lindon, UT 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph 1110 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Star Logistics, LLC Lake Norden 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE DALE'S TIRE & RETREADING, INC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pivotal Fab and Powder 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mitchell Ford 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manitou Equipment America LLC - Madison 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Community Hospital d/b/a/ Madison Regional Health System 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Community Hospital d/b/a Madison Regional Health System 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manitou Group Madison SD 247 FTE
NAT-TCR Oak View Farms LLC 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dancer Logging, Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Keokuk/HMW 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0123 Walnut Creek 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE D L Gasser Construction 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neo Manufacturing, LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claymont Health & Rehab 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koppers Guthrie 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.